Why Insiders Expected Goldman To Drop in 2010


                               Now Goldman's stock now looks very vulnerable technically. It should be!
                        Goldman insiders are selling, not buying, now.  A lot of bad news is coming
                        out.    It may well be charged with massive fraud and frequent insider trading/
                        Goldman's well-placed friends may be run out of office.  An angry populist
                        mob of millions of outsiders want redress NOW.  It has taken nearly a year
                        for this story of fraud and corruption on a gargantuan scale to unfold.  But it
                        will.    Paulsen, Geithner and Goldman Sachs make Madoff and the Mafiosa
                        look like rank amateurs.  See the details:                          .
April 9, 2009   Goldman Sachs Is "The GREED CONNECTION" between Wall Street and Washington
                        GS Stock Keeps Rising:  What's The Lesson?: When You've Got The President As A Tool.


                                   Goldman Sachs Insider Purchases - Last 6 Months, 1/25/2010
                                                                                    Purchases    ZERO
                                                                    Goldman Insider Sales           338,989 shares
                                                                    Institutional Net Sales        16,584,200 shares      
                                                               ( http://finance.yahoo.com/q/it?s=GS )

                      Our TigerSoft chart shows this heavy insider selling and public buying. 
                       See the TigerSoft chart below. 

     Goldman Sachs Chart - 2009-20010-

                           

                           Key Question - Why Did Bernanke, Paulsen
                      and Geithner Honor AIG Debts To Goldman and Others
                        and Why Did They Do So 100 cents on the Dollar.    
              
          "(There is considerable speculation that Goldman's hedges against
       their AIG exposure would not have paid out if AIG was allowed to fail.
       According to a report by the United States Office of the Inspector General
       of TARP, if AIG had collapsed, it would have made it difficult for Goldman
       to liquidate its trading positions with AIG, even at discounts, and it also would
       have put pressure on other counterparties that "might have made it difficult
       for Goldman Sachs to collect on the credit protection it had purchased
       against an AIG default."^[1] Finally, the report said, an AIG default would have
       forced Goldman Sachs to bear the risk of declines in the value of billions
       of dollars in collateralized debt obligations.                           
       (see - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldman_Sachs )

              Another Key Question - Why Are Credit Default Swaps Legal?
         And if They Were Not Legal, Why Did The US Goverbment Honor Them?

         Many states banned them.  To write an insurance policy against a calamity
         that an insurance company could not possibly pay is FRAUD!  Because
         there was no regulation of them, no agency insured that the company
         would ever have the assets to pay the potential losses in the event of
         of a financial melt-down.
                     "If actuaries had been the ones evaluating AIG's insurance premiums
                      for their Credit Default Swap business line, the business would have been
                      shut down instantly as being the equivalent of a fly-by night operator
                      under-collecting premiums in an unsustainable fashion, and that furthermore
                      was insufficiently capitalized to absorb the losses potentially embedded
                      in their product line, and because of both, woud have rightly concluded
                      that AIG was therefore endangering the stability of the entire insurance system."  
          ( http://open.salon.com/blog/don_rich/2009/03/17/aig_goldman_sachs_and_the_real_scandalcredit_default_swaps   )        
     
         Credit default swaps (CDS) were never regulated at the Federal Level.  This
         was not accidental.  Goldman people working in the Government at every level
         and in every financial agency sought de-regulation generally and CDS in particular.