A New Type of Market?
Some Thoughts on Trading ETFs in The
Current Market
Environment.
9/25/2014
The last two months have not been giving us good
orthorox Peerless signals.
I suspect the most important reason is that artificial
computerized trading systems
are now using 1.75% bands around the DJI's 21-day ma.
We should, too.
Use the same non-confirmations but with narrower bands.
Note, too when
a rally fails to reach the upper band. This also
signifies weakness.
We want to use narrower bands with all the major ETFS, too.
Bands around 21- day ma
standard
improved
current
DIA
.030
.015
IWM
.045
.03
QQQ
.04
.025
SPY
.030
.0175
FAS
.10
.05
IBB
.085
.05
When you read the Hotline, understand my dual position.
On the one hand
I am the :"high priest: of the Peerless
orthodoxt, as represented by its automatic
signals.: I am expected to present Peerless as it is
by many. On the other hand,
Peerless has grown in complexity over the years by
adapting to new environments
and taking advantage of new discoveries. So,
each day, .I look at what is unusual
about the current market's technicals and back-test
it, provided it is unusual and
it has not been studied before.
If I were trading ETFs, I would employ the nuances and novel
interpretations
in this environment and keep the Peerless
orthodoxy in mind as background,
but always emphasizing its basic principles of
bands, non-confirmations, A/D Line trends
and confirmed breakouts. Most important in
catching trends, I would use the Closing
Power trend breaks, especially after
non-confirmations or when the trends are extended
and well-tested.
In this environment, it
is always necessary to pick the right ETF. Here we want
liquidity, volatility and a history of past
successes using CP trend-breaks. We want
also to make allowances for where we are in the
bull market's age. Divergences
between the DIA and IWM become severe in the
late stages of a bull market. IWM
will make a better short sale at this time than
DIA or, perhaps IBB (or BBH_, which has a history
of holding up late into bull markets. .
Professionals
Know Best
I still like using Closing Power trend-breaks,
especially after non-confirmations.
One could take just DIA or expand out to the other ETFs,
depending on whether
they are lagging or leading, weak or strong in terms of relative
strength and
internal strength readings. There will be whipsaws
and you might not draw the
lines exactly like I do, but usually it is the presence of a few
bigger trends that
we catch that gives us good gains. DIA is not necessarily
the best to trade.
Below are five of the bigger major ETFs found in our DJI-30 data
download.
DIA
+19.5%
SPY
+23.5%
QQQ
+ 16.3%
FAS
+ 46%
IWM
+ 51.3%
IBB
+ 49.3%
There are times when Peerless does not give enough signals or is
out of synch with
the markets. At these times, I usually first think about
band widths and revert back
to basics.
1. Sometimes, a study of the market shows that momentum is
slowing down and instead
of using the 3.5% bands, a 1.75% upper band would work much
better to sell at
and sell short when there are big or negative non-confirmations,
too. See this in
the DJI current chart. Here I would emphasize the
P-I, A/D Lien and IP21. These
are the essential Peerless internal strength indicators.
We might want to use +1.75% upper bands when the Annualized Rate
of change
of the 21-dma is below, say +.60. We also might want
to use turns upwards by
the 6-day Inverted MKDS turns up to buy.
2) Sometimes, as in the recent Buy B10, Peerless is wrong.
It should not have occurred
when both the P-I and V-I were negative. The Hotline tries
to correct this by mentioning
such limitations as the signals occur.
3) Sometimes, looking back for past parallels yields an important
discovery. Realizing
the limits of Peerless in a market that frequently teaches the
need to be open and
flexible to new variations, I want to put a new signal in if it
tests well.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I will have to go back over the signals and history to find some
past examples. I do
recall that 1963 and 1964 there were hardly any signals.
The market was on good
behavior after the crash of 1962.